United States National Security Council
Specialized Agency Background Guide

Positions and Roles of Selected Members of the USNSC

Attorney General John Ashcroft: The Attorney General’s role for this simulation is to make sure that any public action taken by the USNSC is constitutional.  He also, under the guise of the Patriot Act, heads the department that tries, or may retain, and suspected terrorists internally.  

Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet: For the purposes of this simulation most intelligence will be given to, and if need be divulged by, the Director of Central Intelligence.  He will also be responsible for taking and clandestine actions either required by the NSC or alluded to by it. 

National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice: The National Security Advisor, working with the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security, will help address the threats to the security of the United States both domestically and abroad.  

Secretary of State Colin Powell: The Secretary of State will be the person to interact with the other committee and also be the foremost advisor on all items pertaining to international affairs.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: When it comes to any military matters, the Secretary of Defense will be the one to be the expert on it.  For this simulation knowledge of our defense systems, military protocols, and basic military strategy is required.  

Secretary of Homeland Security Thomas Ridge: The Secretary of Homeland Security will be the one who ultimately addresses security threats internally or in close proximity to the United States of America.  

Vice President Richard Cheney: The Vice President, like in the real USNSC, will be on equal footing with the rest of the members. In this simulation the Vice-President will be the one to discuss the political ramifications of all actions taken by the USNSC.

All participants need to know their roles and responsibilities in the real USNSC and know the basic layout their respective departments.  Also, you must know your person’s political affiliation and their basic past trends.  

 

Topic: Taiwan

The Taiwanese debate has been an issue for the United States for a number of years.  In June of 1950, in order to protect Taiwan from reoccupation by the Chinese, President Truman sent the 7th fleet into the Taiwan straits and the 13th fleet of the Air Force to be stationed in Taiwan itself.  In 1954 the United States signed a defense treaty with Taiwan, effectively making the Chinese province a protectorate of the United States.  This remained the status quo until in 1971 Resolution 2758 restored the rights of China to Taiwan and called for the removing of the United States military forces.  In 1972, while visiting China, Nixon declared that that China and Taiwan are one nation.  Following through with resolution 2758, the United States withdrew its military forces from Taiwan and abrogated the defense treaty in 1978. 

 Although the United States no longer takes the official position that Taiwan ought to be its own country, it does believe that Taiwan ought to not be under the control of the Peoples Republic of China.  In 1992 the United States sold 150 fighters to Taiwan and through the present has sold billions of dollars of fighting equipment to Taiwan. 

 Questions:

bullet

Should Taiwan be an independent state, and if it were to declare independence, should the United States support them? 

bullet

Should the United States stop selling advanced weapons to Taiwan? 

bullet

Should Taiwan again be but under the explicit protection of the United States?

bullet

What should the response be to and aggressive action taken by China to appropriate Taiwan, and remove its home rule?

 

Topic: North Korea

North Korea currently destabilizes the Pacific Rim, and quite possibly the rest of the world, with its threat of developing nuclear weapons and selling them to the highest bidder.  In 1985 North Korea signed the Non Proliferation Treaty which as an undeclared declared nuclear power means that they were not to develop a nuclear weapons program.  Also in 1990 and 1992 North and South Korea signed a Denuclearization Statement.

In 1993, because of its non-compliance with many portions of the NPT, specifically in dealing with the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections of nuclear power facilities, North Korea removed itself from the NPT.  In response the United Nations passed a resolution urging the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to work with the IAEA and to abide by the terms of the Denuclearization treaty signed between the DPRK and the Republic of Korea.

The United States took a unilateral approach when dealing with the DPRK in 1993.  The United States negotiated and came to an agreement with North Korea to allow the United States to repair old nuclear facilities of the DPRK, to help with the safe storage of spent fuel rods and for both nations to work together on creating a peaceful Korean peninsula.  In return for this the DPRK had to freeze and nuclear weapons program.

In accordance with the agreement in 1995 upon assessing the DPRK’s progress in its freezing of its nuclear program and securing its nuclear power facilities the United States eased the economic sanctions placed on the DPRK.

In 2002 it was discovered that in fact the DPRK had begun the development of its nuclear weapons program through uranium enrichment plants.  In 2003 the DPRK and United States, along with the People’s Republic of China, South Korea, the Russian Federation and Japan, multilaterally discussed a resolution to the problem the DPRK presented.  The DPRK for the most part has not cooperated with these negotiations, but recently acknowledged that it might consider eliminating its weapons program.  

Questions:

bullet

How can the United States get North Korea to disassemble its program?

bullet

Should the United States pressure China into taking an even more aggressive stance toward the DPRK?

 

Topic: Terrorism

The United States first met terror in the 21st century when terrorists attacked the U.S.S. Cole.  This was only a precursor to the events of 9/11, where thousands of Americans died on US soil.  The United States has taken a number of steps to secure itself from future attacks, by not only securing its airports but also by giving new departments more power to go after suspected terrorists.  The United States armed forces currently wage the war on terror in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Philippines.

Questions:

bullet

What can the United States to secure itself further internally?

bullet

What is the next front of the War on Terror?

bullet

How has the war been thus far?

 

Topic: Border Control

As any map would depict the United States is bordered by Canada and Mexico, with a number of islands in close proximity.  With this said, thousands of illegal aliens try to cross or borders everyday.  The border control agencies constantly stop Mexicans, Haitians, Cubans and any other person who wishes to enter this country without completing proper procedures.

Securing our borders has always been a problem for the land attests to afford opportunity for all those who are marginalized in their own nations.  President Bush recently lessened the certain enforcement of deportation laws for Mexicans who have entered the nation.

Questions:

bullet

How can we increase border security without preventing those who are legal immigrants from entering the nation?

bullet

Does the shared border with Canada pose and threat to national security?

bullet

Should the Coast Guard be expanded to further protect our waters?

 

Sources

bullet

Lee, Maria Louise, "US, Mexico Tackle Immigration Problems," The PowWow.net." 

bullet

Medeiros, Evan S., "United States-China Relations: Comparative Security and Foreign Policy Process," The National Committee on United States-Chinese Relations. 

bullet

Ng, Chi-ming, and Tsai Pai-chuan, "Taiwan as Possessed by the Republic of China," Taiwan Struggling for Independence: A Historical Perspective

bullet

"The Taiwan Question in China-US Relations," The Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Zimbabwe." 

bullet

 “US-North Korean Relations,” Wikipedia


 

Norfolk Academy   |   IRC   |   NAMUNC   |   Comments: David Rezelman