Chechnya
Special Political and Decolonization Background Guide
When Americans think
of terrorists, they generally imagine suicide bombers and Osama bin Laden.
Russians, however, turn their thoughts to another band of rebels: the
Chechens.
Chechnya was an
autonomous nation in the late 19th century when Tsarist Russia
first conquered it and then spent several decades crushing out nationalism
in the region. A part of the former Soviet Union, Chechnya declared its
independence after the breakup of the U.S.S.R., but the Russian Federation
refused to acknowledge its sovereignty. Russia invaded the Chechen capital
of Groznyy in the mid-1990s, and now it officially controls the volatile
region. Unfortunately, the large and vocal minority of anti-Moscow Chechens
has violently protested Russia’s apparent sovereignty. For as long as
modern Russia has run Chechnya, both domestic and international attempts at
peace have been foiled by violent guerilla and terrorist attacks. Rebels
even took some 800 theatergoers hostage in late 2002, and about 100 Russian
civilians died in the ensuing mêlée. Russians of other ethnic origins have
protested fighting against the Chechen nationalists; some regions have
passed legislation exempting locals from participating in the conflict,
others have actively protested the use of armed combat in domestic clashes.
The region also has a reputation as a focal
point of organized crime, especially for the Russian mafiya, and
business corruption. According to the Library of Congress, “in its
propaganda campaign to justify military action against Chechnya, the Russian
government played upon the stereotypes of the criminal and the dishonest
businessman. It also illustrated the brutal practices of the Chechen rebels
by broadcasting photos of the severed heads of victims along the roads in
the breakaway republic. Meanwhile, Russians adopted the habit of including
all individuals of non-Slavic appearance under the heading ‘Chechen,’
widening the existing strain of racism in Russia's society” ("Russia:
The Chechnya Dilemma").
Human rights issues,
always a side effect of war and armed conflict, abound in the region, and
the United Nations Council on Human Rights (UNCHR) has kept a close watch on
the region, but hundreds of thousands of Chechens have still been displaced
in the discord. Poverty, unemployment, and poor hygiene run rampant, and
aid from various international NGOs has only partially alleviated these
concerns. Additionally, civilians on both sides of the conflict have fallen
victim to the ongoing violence.
In recent years, the
Kremlin has granted Chechnya more autonomy in hopes of quelling the
violence. A much-anticipated election held in October produced a pro-Russian
local leader, but Akhmed Kadyrov ran unopposed, and a majority of the rebel
factions refused to participate in the election at all. Thus, the dissent
and violence of the Chechen war continue to rage.
So why does Russia
insist on retaining the region, aside from wanting to save face? The reason
seems almost American in nature: oil. Valuable pipelines wind throughout
Chechnya, and Putin’s administration, as well as its predecessors, are
unwilling to let them go.
Another complicating
factor here is religion. The Chechen region contains a large number of
Muslims, and, explains the Library of Congress, “Chechnya’s declaration that
it was waging a jihad (holy war) against Russia also raised the specter that
Muslim ‘volunteers’ from other regions and even outside Russia would enter
the fray. However, Russia feared that a move to end the war short of
victory would create a cascade of secession attempts by other ethnic
minorities and present a new target to extreme nationalist Russian
factions.”
Solutions to this
conflict will prove difficult, in large part because the problem is
internal, and the United Nations must bear Russia’s national sovereignty in
mind. Also, Chechen rebels seem unwilling to settle or anything less than
total independence. Objectives and considerations for this discussion, as
suggested by Jennifer Lyon of Kennesaw State University, include:
 |
Determine how
mediations in Chechnya can be obtained given the relationship of world
powers with the Russian Federation (keeping in mind the RF veto power on
the Security Council). |
 |
How can mediations occur, when the war
of terrorism has been extended towards Chechnya? |
 |
What interests do other world powers
have that could prevent mediations and how can a compromise be met given
these interests? |
 |
How do economics affect mediations in
Chechnya? |
 |
Can preventive measures be taken to
protect civilians? |
 |
How can displaced persons be assured
safe harbor? |
 |
Can measures be taken by the global
community to help rebuild war-torn Chechnya and assist in Chechen
sovereignty, if appropriate? |
 |
Evaluate the election of October 2003.
Was it a just election? Should it be reconsidered with mediations from
the global community? |
 |
According to estimates by the
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in August 2003,
there are between 2,000 and 3,000 Chechen rebels. How will they affect
Chechnya’s ability to be sovereign? |
 |
How does the global community address a
domestic issue without jeopardizing relations (economic and the war on
terror should be noted) with the RF? |
 |
What constitutes abuse of human rights
with regards to mediations in Chechnya? |