“Blood
Diamonds”
Special Political and Decolonization Background Guide
For more than a decade, civil wars have ravaged numerous
African countries. Because the economies and governments of such war-torn
nations are almost nonexistent, rebel groups have taken advantage of the
abundant diamond fields across the continent, especially those of Sierra Leone,
Liberia, and Angola. The United Nations, individual governments, and various
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have tried everything from international
peacekeeping troops to economic sanctions, but the situation remains dire. The
diamonds extracted from these nations have garnered the title of “blood
diamonds,” “conflict diamonds,” or “dirty diamonds” due to the outrageous amount
of human suffering that lies behind their mining and exportation. The UN defines
“conflict diamonds” as “diamonds that originate from areas controlled by forces
or factions opposed to legitimate and internationally recognized governments,
and are used to fund military action in opposition to those governments, or in
contravention of the decisions of the Security Council.”
The UN General Assembly (GA) has “recognized that conflict
diamonds are a crucial factor in prolonging brutal wars in parts of Africa, and
underscored that legitimate diamonds contribute to prosperity and development
elsewhere on the continent,” and because these stones serve as a main source of
income for rebel groups, it has enacted various sanctions and embargoes in hopes
of eliminating the dirty diamond trade. Diamond merchants, however, often
ignore restrictions or are unaware of their wares’ origins.
In Sierra Leone, a brutal group called the Revolutionary
United Front (RUF) has essentially controlled the nation since 1991. Recent UN
efforts, such as free elections in 2002, have alleviated the turmoil somewhat,
but reconstruction is far from complete. More than 2 million Sierra Leonean
people have found themselves homeless due to the RUF’s fighting, and many have
also suffered directly at the hands of RUF soldiers. The RUF has abducted,
gang-raped, and impressed into its forces children as young as six, and adults
fare little better. The RUF continues its illegal diamond trade and by doing
so, perpetuates the human rights violations its soldiers have become so skilled
in committing. About two-thirds of Sierra Leone’s current workforce is
dedicated to agriculture, yet the country’s main source of income is still
diamonds, though plans to reopen semiprecious stone mines are underway. As the
CIA World Factbook clarifies, “the fate of the economy depends upon the
maintenance of domestic peace and the continued receipt of substantial aid from
abroad, which is essential to offset the severe trade imbalance and to
supplement government revenues.”
Liberia’s similar problems seemed to be over in 1997, with
the holding of free elections. The new president, Charles Taylor, quickly
progressed to the status of dictator. Though Taylor has few political rivals,
rebel groups across the country have violently protested his reign, throwing the
country back into its previous state of civil war. The Liberian government has
also support Sierra Leone’s RUF via trading in blood diamonds, and Liberia also
exports dirty gems of its own. Sanctions against Liberian diamonds exist but
have not yet taken effect, though the UN enacted arms and travel embargoes
against the country in 2001. The CIA Factbook further notes “A regional
peace initiative commenced in the spring of 2003 but was disrupted by the
Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) indictment of President Taylor on war
crimes charges.” Additionally, the continued turmoil forced several businesses
to pull out of the country’s capital, Monrovia, which did little to help the
economic situation that resulted from both the continued conflicts and Taylor’s
regime. Though rich in many natural resources other than diamonds, Liberia is
in no state to revive successfully its rubber and timber trades.
The National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA),
like the RUF, has wreaked havoc on its country for more than a decade. In 1994,
a treaty with the legitimate Angolan government briefly quelled UNITA activity,
but fighting resumed in 1998, and UNITA, funded by the diamond trade, has
refused to compromise with the UN since then. The country, like Liberia, has
plenty of other underused natural resources, and it remains in a seemingly
perpetual state of civil war.
Solutions to this African mess are complex. Countries
surrounding those discussed have plenty of their own problems, and several have
also been aiding diamond-trading rebels in their exploits. Past UN efforts have
helped somewhat, but peacekeeping troops can do little if those in power refuse
to cooperate. Additionally, civilian governments set up by the international
community have proven either ineffective or have simply been overthrown. The
diamond industry must also be further deterred from buying African diamonds,
perhaps in favor of gems from the Arctic or other sources. Standardization of
diamond exportation is also necessary; an international initiative approved
unanimously by the UN called the Kimberley Process outlines steps to ensure that
only legally mined diamonds from conflict regions land on the market.
Identifying failures in past legislation is essential, as is a dedicated effort
to implementing any new resolutions this body passes.
Sources